Service POJOs allow you to define POJOs as JBoss services. The way you define them is very similar to how you define stateless or stateful session beans. One very important difference is that there will only ever be ONE instance of the service bean. i.e. it is not pooled - the bean instance is a singleton. The singleton bean contains shared state, so data set by one client is accessible by other clients.
ServiceOne also implements ServiceOneManagement.java. ServiceOne.java has been annotated with @Management. JBoss will inspect this interface, and create and install an MBean implementing the attributes and operations defined in the @Management interface. The MBean will work on the same singleton bean instance as the remote and local interfaces.
The default ObjectName used for a service bean is
jboss.j2ee:jar=<jar file>,service=EJB3,name=<Name of @Service bean>,type=<interface>So in our case it will be
jboss.j2ee:jar=tutorial.jar,service=EJB3,name=ServiceOne,type=ManagementInterface
void create() throws Exception; void start() throws Exception; void stop(); void destroy();
You do not need to create all these methods, you can pick and choose. If present the service container will call these methods as follows:
@Service (objectName="tutorial:service=serviceTwo") @Depends ("jboss.j2ee:jar=tutorial.jar,service=EJB3,name=ServiceOne,type=service,type=ManagementInterface") public class ServiceTwo implements ServiceTwoManagement { ... }
The @Depends annotation specifies that this service depends on the service created for ServiceOne. i.e. it cannot be started until the service created for ServiceOne has been started. The definition of the @Depends annotation type is:
public @interface Depends { String[] value(); }
In other words, you could specify an array of object names if you depended on more than one service.
Rather than installing a service under its default object name, you can specify a custom name in the @Service annotation. ServiceTwo will get bound under tutorial:service=serviceTwo instead of the default which would have been jboss.j2ee:jar=tutorial.jar,service=EJB3,name=ServiceTwo,type=ManagementInterface.
@Depends ("jboss.j2ee:jar=tutorial.jar,name=ServiceOne,service=EJB3,type=ManagementInterface") public ObjectName serviceOneName; @Depends ("tutorial:service=serviceTwo") public void setServiceTwo(ServiceTwoManagement service2) { this.service2 = service2; }With regard to the lifecycle dependencies, the effect of annotating fields and setters with @Depends is the same as if we annotated the class. So, ServiceThree cannot be started untill ServiceOne (jboss.j2ee:jar=tutorial.jar,name=ServiceOne,service=EJB3,type=ManagementInterface) and ServiceTwo(tutorial:service=serviceTwo) are started. Annotating the fields and setters with depends though, allows you to inject the dependencies.
The object name of ServiceOne gets injected into the serviceOneName field. More interesting is the injection of ServiceTwo. setServiceTwo() takes a parameter, which is the ServiceTwoManagement management interface of ServiceTwo. The server creates a dynamic proxy for the ServiceTwoManagement interface, and injects that. This means that you can call the methods on the service2 field without caring that you are actually invoking methods on another service.
@AroundInvoke public Object intercept(InvocationContext ctx) throws Exception { System.out.println("ServiceThree - Interceptor"); return ctx.proceed(); }
Unix: $ export JBOSS_HOME=<where your jboss 4.0 distribution is> Windows: $ set JBOSS_HOME=<where your jboss 4.0 distribution is> $ ant
In the JBoss console you should see output similar to this when the .jar archive is deployed
16:52:30,326 INFO [Ejb3Module] found EJB3 service bean: org.jboss.tutorial.service.bean.ServiceOne 16:52:30,387 INFO [Ejb3Module] found EJB3 service bean: org.jboss.tutorial.service.bean.ServiceThree 16:52:30,397 INFO [Ejb3Module] found EJB3 service bean: org.jboss.tutorial.service.bean.ServiceTwo 16:52:30,427 INFO [ProxyDeployer] no declared remote bindings 16:52:30,437 INFO [ProxyDeployer] there is remote interfaces 16:52:30,437 INFO [ProxyDeployer] default remote binding has jndiName of org.jboss.tutorial.service.bean.ServiceOneRemote 16:52:35,113 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceOne - Creating 16:52:35,113 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceOne - Starting 16:52:35,244 INFO [ProxyDeployer] no declared remote bindings 16:52:35,945 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceTwo - Starting 16:52:35,965 INFO [ProxyDeployer] no declared remote bindings 16:52:36,585 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceThree - Starting 16:52:36,585 INFO [EJB3Deployer] Deployed: file:/C:/cygwin/home/Kab/cvs/jboss-head/build/output/jboss-5.0.0alpha/server/all/deploy/tutorial.jar
ServiceOne starts before ServiceTwo which starts before ServiceThree, due to the dependencies we set up earlier.
Then to run the example
$ ant run Buildfile: build.xml run: [java] attribute value for singleton obtained via JMX is what we set via remote i/f: 100 [java] Hello from service One [java] Hello from service Two
The JBoss console should show the following output
17:05:07,796 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceThree - Interceptor 17:05:07,796 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceThree - Calling ServiceOne.sayHello() via JMX server 17:05:07,806 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceThree - Interceptor 17:05:07,806 INFO [STDOUT] ServiceThree - Calling ServiceTwo.sayHello() via MBean proxyNotice that the calls to the ServiceThree methods get intercepted.